Google 'worst seo' without quotes and see what comes up. There are articles dating back to 2008 about the worst SEO practices. I'm sure some of the information in these old articles could still be valid. But really why are such old articles still even ranking? Are there no better, newer articles covering 'worst seo' practices? So much for Google valuing fresh content.
Those are all authority websites and domains, fresh content won't help you if your website is nowhere near that level. If that was the case, people would post same articles rewritten all over again and again.Those are all authority websites and domains, fresh content won't help you if your website is nowhere near that level. If that was the case, people would post same articles rewritten all over again and again.
This is most likely true for many keywords, not just "worst SEO" and you could find it for any keyword combination.This is most likely true for many keywords, not just "worst SEO" and you could find it for any keyword combination.
Very ironic. If Google insists on new content or claims to reward it, then why are they rewarding for old content by giving high ranking to a very old page?Very ironic. If Google insists on new content or claims to reward it, then why are they rewarding for old content by giving high ranking to a very old page?
mqss
Are you sure you want to delete this post?