Enter a reason for deleting this comment
I see Google plus give do follow link on post, yet Facebook, twitter and other social networking website nofollow. Can Google Plus is better than Facebook and Twitter
Google can afford aggressive marketing approaches like merging Youtube accounts with G+ and so on. They still have some more possibilities, so yes. They G+ could become more popular than Facebook in the future.
I suppose that one day they could be better than FB. Right now I do not care much for G+ but that is my own personal opinion.
Facebook isn't better than Google+, just different. Neither site is superior, though Facebook is older and thus has more users. And, you can't use both sites in the same way or you will miss the point of both sites.
I suppose it is possible but I think G+ sucks wind compared to FB.
For purely SEO value with backlinking, maybe Google+ is better. Then again, Google contradicts itself by talking about author authority on social sites and shares of author content as being important for SEO and search engine ranking. So maybe Facebook and Twitter have an edge even being no follow links as you can get the links and build a solid community. Though maybe Google is secretly referring only to shares of Google+ content rather than Facebook shares.
Here comes that term again that until now I still have to know exactly what no-follow and do-follow mean. Anyway, comparing Google Plus with Facebook is like comparing a big tree with a small tree that has lots of fruit. The big tree which is Google Plus has the potential for having more fruits while the small tree can only have much fruits because it is small. But at present the small tree is way ahead in terms of fruits.